
E 'out of any discussion that attempts to cemented practices of popular participation is a symptom of a desire for change, a sort of sea change in the concept of Democracy. This desire to notice, especially those of us internet users, the web is instead a bit 'hidden from other media, and this becomes a restriction on political fantasy that generate the forms of participatory democracy, we are a society in which a self
of technical progress and knowledge, is paid not only for religious reasons or other concrete, but I think even for simple matters of prudence, understood precisely in the meaning of the term. But I turn the sock! Just prudence supports the effort of 'imagination of those who promote the participation, that will likely prudent to maintain and implement the conditions of democracy, in fact, more often than their participation is stimulated by the debates concerning the conception of "progress" and environmental issues. Many targets the slow pace at times present in participatory practices and the difficulties associated with it, but we can fight back, specifically, according to our philosophy that democracy is invented hour by hour. This sort of opposition to the institutions, but in reality this is not, it becomes beneficial to democracy because democracy requires there to the Opposition! In contrast was
conflict powers, is in fact anti-demagoguery. The problem of populism, its definition and its star, that is, the demagogic politician in a democracy (the one who wants to govern alone), problems are already known to the classical tradition and to modern, and, in the history of "recent" begin to find the first fingers pointing in the late eighteenth century. Democracy, as opposed to demagoguery, requires the joint processing of civil conflict. Imagine and promote participation practices, show that another way of "doing" democracy is possible, should help to arouse the citizens el'insofferenza antibodies against the demagogic politician, and more generally against the demagogic style, which can be expressed both in the exercise of power, as in the SO propaganda. Today
parties and their leaders are increasingly used in marketing and TV, err debate that focuses more on issues but on the people and their image, what we are doing, then, speaking of participation? Very! To support the practice, to imagine, but we need also a turning point in the holding of scientific, not just a matter of theory or speculation, the practice of participation have been reports of communication and circulation of knowledge practices, their approach always depends on the intellectual capacity and practice of who supports them. It is clear that many difficulties can arise from the subject, in each of them can be difficult to tolerate otherness, the problem is how much ambiguity and conflict, we are able to tolerate, to "bear" compelling practical need to imagine, to invest in formation in an intelligent way, to care for the epistemology that supports practices; need to think and to spread the practice of participation as a practical elaboration of civil conflicts. Giorgio
Bargna