Lower Left Back Pain Causes

L 'Italy is a colony of participatory democracy

turning on the network trying combinations of the Italian economic situation and that the crisis in Argentina a few years ago, I stumbled upon this book, I agree that not everything is written there (guess it's part! ), but surely there are good food for thought. Good reading, George.
http://italia.pravda.ru/italia/5412-8/
Italy and 'a colony?
15.04.2007 Source: Pravda.ru
The media are peddling the image of Italy as a free and democratic country, where the population enjoys political and economic power. But it 's really so '?
The suspicion that the dominant economic-financial elite is appropriate in our country from all points of view and that is driving him to the precipice, he came even to the Financial Times, in an article in the March 16, 2006 wrote that " Italy is following the same path to ruin of Argentina. " The author, Richard Perle, a member of the extreme American right and an avid supporter of George W. Bush, so it's hard to believe that will put a bad light on the ruling elite.
The comparison between Italy and Argentina comes from financial considerations, notably the Italian choice to take the euro as its currency, although the country sentenced to have a weak economy, because of the economic policy choices made by governments, which tend to benefit foreign capital rather than the development of the country, as happens in a colony. Even Argentina, peg their currencies to the dollar, was found to deal with a strong currency, while its economy was in foreign hands. What happened to Argentina is known.
Italian companies have been largely recognized by the big Anglo-American corporation. Today, Italy is the European country less competitive, and that more firms into foreign hands. The International Monetary Fund and the European Central Bank are breathing down his neck to control debt payments, ignoring the level of wealth or poverty of Italian citizens. In fact, even to demand payments, the IMF does not hesitate to ask for cuts in public spending (health, education, administration, etc.). And further privatization, worsening conditions in the country.
The main purpose of the IMF (we must remember that it is a financial institution controlled by the Anglo-American Bankers Association) is to impoverish the Italian citizens, in keeping with what is already, in 1998, Zbigniew Brzezinski revealed in his book The Grand Chessboard : American primacy and its geostrategic imperatives. The excessive prosperity of Western Europe, according to Brzezinski, was a serious obstacle, since this level of wealth was higher than that of the average American citizens, and being regarded as an American protectorate of Europe, this was unacceptable.
Europe has a fundamental position of strength for America's geo-strategic. The Atlantic Alliance authorizing America to have political influence and military weight in mainland Europe ... if you grow up, they will benefit directly the influence of American ... Western Europe is largely an American protectorate and its vassals and were reminded Paying tribute to the old empires ... Europe needs to solve the problem caused by its social redistribution system that is too heavy and hampers its ability to initiatives.
Europe was to be indebted and impoverished that would impose U.S. domination over the whole Eurasia. Urgent impoverish the middle class, and what has happened in Italy in part because of the Biagi Law, which legalizes labor exploitation. The rest did the banking system, the dictatorship imposed on the Third World (which has forced millions of people to supply labor semischiavile, lowering labor costs and dismantling the system of rights, the result of political struggles and trade unions), and privatization, promoted by the IMF. Media campaigns are lying to believe that the IMF and the ECB take the "stability" of the country or to the "competitiveness" of Italian companies, as is the exact opposite: want to keep in check the entire country's economy, shrinking with little debt and make it competitive through various strategies.
Our politicians, instead of trying to thwart the power of the IMF, supports him, and touted as fair and authoritative, showing that Italy is also politically subjugated to foreign rule, as a colony. In many ways (privatization, protecting Italian products, agreeing to pay for the rights of seigniorage, foraging private companies, etc.). Our governments work for the economic and financial destruction of our country, and not for our well-being and our values.
The level of poverty in our country increased from 6.5% of population of the nineties, 11, 7% in 2001, up to 12% in 2005. The neoliberal reforms imposed by the IMF Italy have stolen wealth to the middle class and below, to enrich the already rich elites, as demonstrated by the analysis made by the Bank of Italy in the period 1989/1998:
10% of households poor had 2.7% of total income in 1989, while in 1998 this share fell to 2%. 10% of the richest families has instead increased its share from 25.2% to 27.5%. The increase of the Gini index, in 9 years was 11% ... small increases (decreases) of the Gini index cause huge increases (decreases) the gap between the poorest and the richest of all. Today about 20% of the richest families have more than half the country's income while the poorest 20% of Italian households have only about 6%. This explains why the rich Italian families such as Benetton, Pirelli and Falck, is so condescending to the colonization of Italy: this ensures their greater wealth and privilege.
A country is subject to colonial rule when it is not master of his territory and does not choose freely their own political and economic organization. Indigenous rights are subordinated to the colonial interests of the dominant power, which stands above the law. The colonial authorities of the countries require substantial payments, as with the banks holding our debt, which put our authorities to prepare a financial report in order to pay the debt.
debt is actually a form of taxation imposed by banks, engineered so that citizens believe they have received from having to pay something, whereas it is a colonial type of taxation, that is designed to impoverish the people and enrich power system. The debt is so high that Italy imposed in 2002 was equivalent to one third of total public debt of all countries of the European Union (which was 4.7077 trillion euro). Despite the financial maneuvers that have bled the country in January 2007, the debt was yet to 1.6054 trillion. It will never be extinguished, allowing Italy to remain for ever liable banking elite. The financial
also the target of allocating money for participation in the wars of the dominant country, and in the last financial, the government increased these costs to 20.354 billion euro, which is a high sum for a country that has no enemies and is not officially at war. It includes such costs only if you think that any country subjected to a colonial power is obliged to participate in imperial military spending in the country. Italians pay 41% of the cost of stationing of U.S. bases, this is a total of 366 million dollars a year. Just as
a colony, we also suffer military occupation and forced to pay it.
(....) (...) The privatization of public enterprises (railways, post offices, highways, etc..) Produced serious economic losses, deterioration in service quality and increased cost to the user. Sell \u200b\u200boff public assets is not just impoverish the country (which loses the profits of the companies sold and is also forced to finance them), but also weaken the government. For example, the Minister of Economic Development Pier Luigi Bersani has touted her as an important reform that eliminates the cost of recharging the phone cards, but without saying that the government had no power to prevent the amount of charge was reinstated by the tariff increase. Within a few days, some telephone companies changed their pricing plans, so as to guarantee the same revenue they had previously.
This is a clear example of how privatization steal their money and power to the entire community, forcing people to submit to the overwhelming power of private companies. If our ministers were really defending the interests of citizens, against the corporations and banks, would be immediately referred to the 'order' by the EU and the U.S..
The privatization of Telecom, in October of 1997, allowed a group of entrepreneurs and banks to seize company, and the Treasury was only 3.5%. The plan for control of Telecom had been designed by Merrill Lynch, the American Banking Group of Donaldson Lufkin & Jenrette and Chase Manhattan Bank. After ten years of privatization, the budget was disastrous from all points of view: more than 20,000 people were made redundant, the shares had lost a lot of money to investors, the costs for users were increased and the company was losing money.
Damage to the privatization of Telecom were not only financial, but also for the quality and safety of the service. The privacy of citizens is not in any way protected, and the scandals of the last years have tried.
Today the company is badly reduced, and the titles actionist oscillate. Three big banks, Morgan Stanley, Goldman Sachs and UBS can raise or lower any capacity, having 70% in the hands of speculative credit world, and being able to spread news that affect the behavior of investors. Manipulating the value of the shares, it affects the performance of the company, which allows banking giants prepare the ground in order to appropriate, as is happening with Alitalia.
Pirelli opened exclusive negotiations with the giant American Telephone and Telegraph Company (AT & T), which belongs to a group of bankers, who this year won a contract in the U.S. rich public, to manage the telecommunications sector, and provide services to 135 of 184 federal agencies, along with Qwest and Verizon. Negotiations with AT & T and America Movil will last until April 30, then Generali and Mediobanca will have 15 days to exercise their right of first refusal.
do not know yet if it will be AT & T to get hold of one of the most important companies of our country, but we already know what will happen after the sale: there will be redundancies, increase the cost to the user, the quality of service will always be poorer, emerging from time to time lawlessness, which revealed the possibility of control over every citizen.
who doubts that today's Italy has characteristics of colonial nature try to write a letter to the Italian authorities to demand explanations on bank debt and seigniorage, on privatization, on the territorial sovereignty of Italy or on nuclear warheads. Will not get any clear answer, thorough and honest (if ever were to receive some type of response), and this will be a proof that our authorities are in the service of banks and international corporations, and subject to, the rights of Italian citizens, as happens in the colonies.
Antonella Randazzo www.disinformazione.it

Spc Card Number For Mastercard

Formulas: Formulas and-TM

practices deliberative U.S. thanks to new technologies, have evolved considerably, allowing many people to meet, even in different locations to discuss and express themselves about public policy. Recently, testing a new version of TM, which offers some innovative features in terms of technology
adopted: the Electronic Town Meeting [e-TM].
method "electronic town meeting" [e-TM] allows you to mix the benefits of discussion for small groups, with those of a survey aimed at a broad audience.
In this way, 'alternating between moments of discussion and moments of individual voting allows you to produce the outcome of the discussions of applications to be submitted immediately to the assembly. In the e-TM are held in succession three different phases, to facilitate the participants in the treatment of the topics under discussion:
1. a first phase of information and analysis through the contributions of
documents and experts;
2. a second round of discussion in small groups;
3. a third phase in which the themes summarized and returned in the form of questions are offered to participants who can therefore make a direct voting individually with the keypad (polling keypads).
This model of deliberative democracy is now recognized internationally, and this method is becoming popular now in many contexts. The U.S. approach has been used in situations different in Europe and has been tested, but small scale and not open to the public. The first time was in Italy in Turin in September 2005, before the Winter Olympics: two thousand Italian and foreign students met to discuss the major issues in the world. Through the town meeting
elettronic technology is put at the service of participation, in practice, a review of those cyber public meetings and assemblies of citizens, the bridge between representative democracy and direct democracy. A great example of e-TM in 4000 with the tele-voting New Yorkers have expressed their views on the best reconstruction project for the area of \u200b\u200bthe Twin Towers.
continues

Outside Temperature Sensor Ford Mondeo

of participatory democracy: Town Meeting

Continuianamo disquisition on the methods of participatory democracy, speaking today of the Town Meeting, a particular form of Local Government, practiced ease and regularity, in the northeast U.S., in the region called New England (Vermont, Connecticut, Maine, Rhode Island and Massachusetts), the first area colonized by the British in the USA. Town Meeting I have a story that has more than 300 years, currently being implemented in smaller towns of 6000 inhabitants, but this does not preclude the larger cities, at any time, to switch to a representative form of Town Meeting. These town meetings are held usually once a year, traditionally the first Tuesday in March, basically, start to finish in the morning and early afternoon. Each city regulates these Assemblies participate on their own discretion, therefore, in proceedings of Town Meeting, have evolved many different forms. The most common form of Town Meeting, open to the participation and the vote of citizens, the Open Town Meeting, which seems to be active in at least 1000 cities, in this formula are parties may participate in all citizens entitled to vote, decisions binding for administrators. We discuss all the issues that concern the administration of the city, starting from the purchase of suppelletili, the entire city budget, deciding assign as education, roads, health. A Town Meeting is preceded by a notice exhibited in public places, at least 1 month before and that shows the location and time of 'meeting with all the listed topics to be discussed. The turnout varies widely, depending on the size of the city, the average is 20.5% (participation in local votes in the rest of the U.S., when performed alone, unaccompanied or state presidential voting, sometimes coming at rates well below 10%), but the smaller ones you get at 80% equity. You choose at the beginning of 'the moderator of the meeting' meetings, but generally, though not a rule, is that of the previous year '. During the Town Meeting are also elected selectmen, or administrators who will implement the decisions taken during the day. The Shareholders 'Meeting takes place in an orderly manner, following established rules and codes of conduct agreed with, the citizens' will follow that last an average of one minute, although there is no time limit, the length is adjusted simply by habit and from the habit of being concise. The moderator reads the items to 'agenda and, consequent, the proposals recommended by the directors in office. Then seek the opinion of those present, if no one raises his hand, the point is considered approved. Who intervenes, usually, it does ask for clarification or to propose an amendment in this case who does the amendment must be supported by the support of other citizens (the number varies from city to city). If the amendment is submitted, the moderator is to start a discussion in which everyone can participate. The vote takes place, often through the voice, the moderator asked who 's agreement to say yes, that' s agreement to say no. With the outcome clearly and without doubt, we proceed with the next point, otherwise you vote by raising hands, without a proper count. If the situation is still not clear, it goes on the ballot, by secret ballot on a piece of paper written and delivered in a box on the board of the moderator, who, after making the statement. The town meeting was a remarkable story, this has allowed the development of procedures that have made them fast and productive.
continues

Hungry With Stomach Flu

Formulas of participatory democracy: The methods of participatory democracy

formula longer participating in the note, which was inspiring for new experiences, it certainly is the political transformation experienced in Porto Alegre (Participatory Orçamento in Italian "participatory budget"), which carries germs potentially revolutionary: the renunciation of the political class to large slices of the privileges inherent in his decision making, attention to vulnerable and minority economic, ethnic, sexual and cultural, the momentum to develop citizens with strong critical consciousness the actions of their elected officials.
We see a little but the European context.

At European level the largest experiment in participatory democracy is surely the French CNDP (Cationale Commissions du Débat Public). The CNDP is an independent body based national "soul" of public debates on issues primarily related to the great questions of administration or public works. The CNDP is composed of a series of CPDP (Particulières Commissions du Débat Public) that are created specifically for each file open. The CNDP has to decide within two months from the date of the various instances of participation that can differ depending on the case. The
CNDP has at its disposal several options: It can organize its own initiative, a public debate by giving the organization a CPDP created to 'end, entrust the organization of public debate to the person concerned or refer the person directly involved in the discussion mode boobies of public debate.
In the first two cases, those who managed the public debate has two months to establish the
issues of debate and organization. The debate is developed in four months,
that may be raised to six by the CNDP in exceptional cases, at the end of the debate's organizers
draw up a report that is used as a guideline for a final decision
. In Europe there are also significant experience of the so-called "citizens' juries" on this however, we will discuss later.
We also look to the Italian context
The first Italian city to have a statute that is binding on the council approving a
participatory budgeting was the Immanuel Parish Hall, located in the province of Milan
, with 17,000 population. The structure that was given to the preparation of financial statements
is divided into three phases, the same structure that has been broadly adopted in many other
participatory budgeting, Novellara, Modena, Piacenza, Pescara, San Benedetto del Tronto, Udine
etc. . We find a first phase of listening to the citizens through the collection of proposals ol'emersione needs of citizens, this according to the different realities shall be examined in different ways: it goes by the assemblies of specific proposals to build boards. A second step is the screening of proposals, feasibility through tables with a national or municipal offices affected directly by the third phase generates a direct vote of citizens on the specific proposals, the proposals with the most votes are taken and entered into the city budget. Unfortunately, to date, including the legal limits, not all funds in the budget are discussed through participatory forms, most of this money is devoted to the creation of public spaces such as parks, gardens and sports fields.
ultimate, in my opinion, it is rather the experience of the town of Groton (AP) where the participation of citizens in the choices of public administration has been ongoing for almost twenty years
, where talk of participation in a pure optical economic balance is less than
understatement. Groton spread participation by two specially created bodies and committees of district assemblies. The first are brought together periodically before the preparation of the budget and aim to arrive at a shared approval of this document
book so important to the community. The assemblies have
the advantage of binding to the participatory process of community and the size of
public debate, this is essential because only in such cases the private interest is overridden by
Community dimension and becomes an individual problem
common battle. The neighborhood committees instead represent the size of the permanent
participation of citizens, they have a duty to monitor the status of implementation of
collective choices and possibly make new requests. The committees also have the task of preparing for the debate
meeting which also agreed with the dates
government and not least also play an important role
information to the community. How much was born in Tuscany, the first regional law on participation, we have already spoken, but one thing should be added to what has been said, the law on the participation of Tuscany has built through participation (in Marina di Carrara, example, was held a town meeting on this topic) to which the citizens have responded actively redando, for example, the preliminary document of the law, after an initial step in the Regional Council, was, further discussed by participants at the town meeting.
(continued)